Search for: "C C Moore" Results 1 - 20 of 1,696
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2008, 10:21 am
Christopher Moore points to one area where I think both user and creator rights advocates should agree  - the educational exemption in C-61 is bad, bad policy. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 12:23 am by Michael Geist
As Industry Minister Tony Clement and Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore continue to work on a copyright reform package, it is worth reviewing comments from both Ministers over the past year about C-61, copyright reform, and innovation. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 1:57 pm
On October 29 at noon, CLA's Racial Justice Committee presents "From Justice Eileen C. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 11:09 pm by Michael Geist
In one of the strangest responses to C-32 yet, Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore told the House of Commons yesterday that consumers are supportive of C-32 and cites as evidence the Canadian Chamber of Commerce. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 2:06 pm by Daniel Cappetta
In 2015, two weeks after the effective date of the amendment to Rule 3.5(c), Moore’s appellate attorney communicated by mail with the jurors who had deliberated at Moore’s trial. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 2:06 pm by Daniel Cappetta
In 2015, two weeks after the effective date of the amendment to Rule 3.5(c), Moore’s appellate attorney communicated by mail with the jurors who had deliberated at Moore’s trial. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 2:00 am by Paul Caron
United States is available live on C-Span today at 10:00 am ET: American Spectator, The Scariest SCOTUS Case This Term: Moore v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 10:44 pm by Michael Geist
Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore has told the Canadian Press that the government plans to reintroduce Bill C-32 in "exactly the same form" as the legislation that died on the order paper with the election call earlier this year. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:26 am by Michael Geist
Update: Moore implausibly tells the CBC that consumers support Bill C-32 even if consumer groups say they don't. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 12:07 am by Michael Geist
  That approach was derided by both Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore and Industry Minister Tony Clement as the iTax last spring and Clement tweeted a response today. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:29 pm by Michael Geist
Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore has already indicated the bill will be reintroduced unchanged from Bill C-32 and that the legislative committee will pick up where it left off without the need to hear from any persons or groups who appeared under Bill C-32. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 12:43 am by Michael Geist
Yesterday I posted an annotated version of Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore's "radical extremist" speech from last month. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:49 am by sally
R (Moore) v Skipton Fund Ltd [2010] EWHC 3070 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 308 “For the purposes of a claim for an ex gratia payment from public funds, there was nothing irrational or unfair in requiring certain people infected with hepatitis C through treatment with NHS blood or blood products prior to September 1991, to show that spontaneous clearance of the virus after a period of six months had occurred. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 1:38 pm by Clare Freeman, RWS, WD Mich
On June 30, 2009, the panel of Judges Moore, Gilman, and Phillips (E.D. [read post]